Board of County Commissioners v. Humphrey

47 Ga. 565
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 15, 1873·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

McCay, Judge.

Nothing is better settled than that private property cannot fee taken for public uses, except under the forms and by due course of law. This bill and answer and affidavits are full of [568] conflicting statements. It is uncertain, especially, whether the public authorities have or have not pursued the law providing how land shall be taken and paid for to make a road. Amid these conflicting statements it was only proper that the Court should hesitate to believe, with positiveness, either side, and should conclude to keep things as they are until a jury can pass upon the facts, with witnesses duly sworn and cross-examined before it. We think here was no abuse of discretion. The ferry can well wait.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Board of County Commissioners v. Humphrey, 47 Ga. 565 (Ga. 1873).

47 Ga. 565 (Board of County Commissioners v. Humphrey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mitchell v. State Highway Department
118 S.E.2d 88 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1961)
Martin v. Fulton County
101 S.E.2d 716 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1958)
McGreggor v. W. L. Florence Construction Co.
65 S.E.2d 809 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1951)
Thomas v. City of Cairo
57 S.E.2d 192 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)
City of Blue Ridge v. Kiker
9 S.E.2d 253 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Huddleston v. City of Eugene
43 L.R.A. 444 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1899)
G. H. & S. A. R. R. v. Mud Creek I. A. & M. Co.
1 White & W. 169 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1883)