Board of County Commissioners v. City of Marlow

1930 OK 569, 298 P. 255, 148 Okla. 126, 1930 Okla. LEXIS 389
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedDecember 16, 1930
Docket19958
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 1930 OK 569 (Board of County Commissioners v. City of Marlow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Board of County Commissioners v. City of Marlow, 1930 OK 569, 298 P. 255, 148 Okla. 126, 1930 Okla. LEXIS 389 (Okla. 1930).

Opinion

LESTER, Y. C. J.

This is an action by cbe city of Marlow against the board of county commissioners of Stephens county to recover certain sums of money belonging to the said city, in which it was alleged it was collected 'by the county and diverted to its own use and benefit and also for interest thereon. The claims for recovery coyer a period of time beginning in the year 1908 and ending in the year 1934. Suit was filed on December 28, 1927; service had on the defendants on the same date, and return thereon made on December 30, 1927. The defense was a general denial and plea of limitation. Trial was had to the court, and judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff for the amoiint claimed.

The principal question here presented is whether or not the defendant was entitled to the benefit of the statute of limitations.

The case is a companion ease to the ease of Brown, Co. Treas., v. Board of Education, No. 19957, 148 Okla. 97, 298 Pac. 249, this day decided by this court. We held in that case that the statute, of limitations was available to the county as a defense to claims against a county more than three years prior to filing of an action. This holding is decisive of this case.

We also there held that the county is not liable for interest except where lawfully contracted for and imposed by statute.

Judgment is reversed, with directions to proceed in said cause not inconsistent with the opinion herein.

MASON, C. J., and HEFNER, CULLISON. SWINDALL, and ANDREWS, JJ., concur. RILEY, X, dissents. HUNT and CLARK, J.T.. absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Board of Com'rs of Jackson County v. United States
100 F.2d 929 (Tenth Circuit, 1938)
City of Picher v. Board of Com'rs of Ottawa County
1933 OK 602 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1933)
Board of Com'rs of Creek County v. City of Sapulpa
1933 OK 168 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1930 OK 569, 298 P. 255, 148 Okla. 126, 1930 Okla. LEXIS 389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-county-commissioners-v-city-of-marlow-okla-1930.