Board of County Commissioners v. Board of County Commissioners

66 P. 1018, 63 Kan. 857, 1901 Kan. LEXIS 242
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided December 7, 1901·No. No. 12,402·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

A change of venue was had in a civil case pending in Elk county. It was sent to Green[858] wood county for trial. The latter county brought an action to recover from Elk county the jurors’ per diem fees, $422; for the attendance of the sheriff on the court, $19.50; for the court bailiff, $19,50; and for the stenographer, $60. Judgment was confessed for the stenographer’s fees. A recovery for the other items was denied in the court below.

We see no error in this. Costs incurred in criminal prosecutions by the state are by statute made payable by the county where the offense is committed., (Gen. Stat. 1901, § 5763.) We have been cited to no statute casting liability on Elk county for the items for which a recovery was denied. No costs were recoverable at common law; their allowance depends on the statute. (The State v. Campbell and Jones, 19 Kan. 481.)

The language used in the opinion in Shawnee Co. v. Wabaunsee Co., 4 Kan. 312, is hot applicable to the present controversy. That was a criminal case.

The judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

Doster, C.J., Johnston, Smith, Ellis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Board of County Commissioners v. Board of County Commissioners, 66 P. 1018, 63 Kan. 857, 1901 Kan. LEXIS 242 (kan 1901).

66 P. 1018 (Board of County Commissioners v. Board of County Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commissioners of Shawnee Co. v. Commissioners of Wabaunsee Co.
4 Kan. 312 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1868)
State v. Campbell
19 Kan. 481 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1878)