Board of Com'rs of Creek County v. State
This text of 1915 OK 540 (Board of Com'rs of Creek County v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*479 Opinion by
(after stating the facts as above). The certificate of the trial judge to the purported case-made filed in this case not being attested by the clerk of such trial court, with the seal of such court attached, such purported case-made is a nullity, and confers no jurisdiction upon this court to review any question presented by such purported case-made. Stallard v. Knapp, 9 Okla. 591, 60 Pac. 234; Oligschlager v. Grell, 13 Okla. 632, 75 Pac. 1131; Montemat v. Johnson, 42 Okla. 443, 141 Pac. 779.
Rule 16 of this court (38 Okla. viii, 137 Pac. x) prescribes the form of a certificate to a transcript when' the appeal to this court is upon a transcript of the record of the trial court, and' prescribes that such certificate must be under the seal of said court, and, as the certificaté of said clerk to the purported case-made is not made under the seal of said court, consequently said purported case-made cannot be considered as a transcript of the record of the proceedings of the trial court in this cause. Childers v. Fleetwood, 39 Okla. 455, 135 Pac. 931.
As the purported case-made is a nullity, and the same cannot be regarded as a transcript, this appeal should be dismissed.
' By the Court: It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1915 OK 540, 150 P. 455, 48 Okla. 477, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-comrs-of-creek-county-v-state-okla-1915.