Board of Commissioners v. Vonschriltz

Ohio Supreme Court

Board of Commissioners v. Vonschriltz

82 Ohio St. (N.S.) 412

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 12, 1910

DocketNo. 11719

StatusPublished

This text of 82 Ohio St. (N.S.) 412 (Board of Commissioners v. Vonschriltz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Board of Commissioners v. Vonschriltz, 82 Ohio St. (N.S.) 412 (Ohio 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same hereby is, reversed. And this court proceeding to render the judgment which said circuit court should have rendered,

It is considered and adjudged that the judgment of said court of common pleas be, and the same hereby is, reversed because said court erred in refusing to give the third and seventh instructions requested by the original defendant, and because the evidence of the original plaintiff showed that the injury of her intestate was due to his own want of care.

It is further considered that said plaintiff in error recover its costs in this action in this court and in the circuit court and that said cause be remanded to the court of common pleas of Pike county for a new trial.

Summers, C. J., Crew, Davis, Si-iauck and Price, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same hereby is, reversed. And this court proceeding to render the judgment which said circuit court should have rendered,

It is considered and adjudged that the judgment of said court of common pleas be, and the same hereby is, reversed because said court erred in refusing to give the third and seventh instructions requested by the original defendant, and because the evidence of the original plaintiff showed that the injury of her intestate was due to his own want of care.

It is further considered that said plaintiff in error recover its costs in this action in this court and in the circuit court and that said cause be remanded to the court of common pleas of Pike county for a new trial.

Summers, C. J., Crew, Davis, Si-iauck and Price, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 Ohio St. (N.S.) 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-commissioners-v-vonschriltz-ohio-1910.