Board of Commissioners v. R. S. Dickson & Co.
190 N.C. 330
Opinion
As the appellant has filed no brief in this Court, and no error is made to appear from an examination of the record proper, we must affirm the judgment on motion of appellee. Mfg. Co. v. Simmons, 97 N. C., 89; Smith v. Mfg. Co., 151 N. C., 260; Jones v. R. R., 153 N. C., 419; Davis v. Wall, 142 N. C., 450.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Board of Commissioners v. R. S. Dickson & Co., 190 N.C. 330 (N.C. 1925).
190 N.C. 330 (Board of Commissioners v. R. S. Dickson & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Davis v. Wall.
55 S.E. 350 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1906)
Randleman Manufacturing Co. v. Simmons
1 S.E. 923 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1887)
Smith v. Globe Home Furniture Manufacturing Co.
65 S.E. 1009 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1909)
Jones v. . R. R.
69 S.E. 427 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1910)