Board of Commissioners v. Ohio ex rel. Bowman
286 U.S. 526, 52 S. Ct. 494
Opinion
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) County of Mobile v. Kimball, 102 U. S. 691, 703, 704; Houck v. Little River Drainage District, 239 U. S. 254, 262; Joslin Mfg. Co. v. City of Providence, 262 U. S. 668, 674; Memphis & Charleston Ry. Co. v. Pace, 282 U. S. 241, 245, 246; (2) Doyle v. Atwell, 261 U. S. 590, 591, 592; McCoy v. Shaw, 277 U. S. 302, 303; Howat v. Kansas, 258 U. S. 181, 185, 186.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Board of Commissioners v. Ohio ex rel. Bowman, 286 U.S. 526, 52 S. Ct. 494 (1932).
286 U.S. 526 (Board of Commissioners v. Ohio ex rel. Bowman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
County of Mobile v. Kimball
102 U.S. 691 (Supreme Court, 1881)
Houck v. Little River Drainage District
239 U.S. 254 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Howat v. Kansas
258 U.S. 181 (Supreme Court, 1922)
New York Ex Rel. Doyle v. Atwell
261 U.S. 590 (Supreme Court, 1923)
Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. City of Providence
262 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1923)
McCoy v. Shaw
277 U.S. 302 (Supreme Court, 1928)
Memphis & Charleston Railway Co. v. Pace
282 U.S. 241 (Supreme Court, 1931)