Board of Commissioners v. Fahlor
This text of 31 N.E. 1112 (Board of Commissioners v. Fahlor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— This case is in this court for the second time. Fahlor v. Board, etc., 101 Ind. 167. A branch of the subject-matter of .this controversy, exhibiting some of the facts and questions contained in the record* now before us was considered in Johnson v. Board, etc., 107 Ind. 15. The cases to which we have referred lay down two leading rules which govern this case.
First. Notice is essential to confer jurisdiction in proceedings for the establishment of a public road, where an [427]*427adjacent owner’s land is sought to be subjected to a special assessment.
Second. Where judicial proceedings are void because of an entire absence of notice to a property owner, a subsequent statute assuming to validate such proceedings is invalid.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 N.E. 1112, 132 Ind. 426, 1892 Ind. LEXIS 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-commissioners-v-fahlor-ind-1892.