Board of Commissioners v. Dart

67 Ga. 765
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 15, 1881
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 67 Ga. 765 (Board of Commissioners v. Dart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Board of Commissioners v. Dart, 67 Ga. 765 (Ga. 1881).

Opinion

In this case, Judge Mershon being disqualified, Judge Simmons, of the Macon circuit, presided in his stead. The case was tried at November adjourned term of Glynn superior court and resulted in a verdict for plaintiffs. The defendant filed his motion for a new trial and obtained a rule nisi.

Not having time to complete his brief of evidence,, he obtained an order from the court to have “ until the next term of this court to perfect the said motion and brief of evidence.” The next term of the court convened on the fourth Monday in May, 1881, and on June 22a, 1881, during said term, the brief of evidence was filed and approved. Plaintiffs alleged that defendant, in failing to make out and file the brief of evidence in the interval between the adjournment of the November term and the following May term, had failed to comply with the terms of the order, and moved to dismiss the motion for new trial on this ground, which motion was overruled. Judge Simmons certifies that he held an adjourned term of Glynn superior court in February, 1881, but not having time to [766]*766finish the disqualified cases, promised to return in June following and try them ; that this motion was filed during that week, and he allowed Counsel “ until the next term of court” to perfect the brief of evidence; that “my understanding of the order at the time was, that they (counsel) would have until I went there to pass on the motion, as Judge Mershon was disqualified. Acting on that, I overruled the motion to dismiss.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chandler v. Chandler
11 S.E.2d 666 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Henderson v. Edwards
191 Iowa 871 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1921)
Gainesville Grocery Co. v. Bank of Dahlonega
102 S.E. 912 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)
Sugerman v. Jacobs
160 A.D. 411 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)
State ex rel. Birdzell v. Jorgenson
142 N.W. 450 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1913)
Blalock v. State
108 Tenn. 185 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1901)
Conway v. Smith Mercantile Co.
49 L.R.A. 201 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1896)
St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. Gracy
29 S.W. 579 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 Ga. 765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-commissioners-v-dart-ga-1881.