Board of Commissioners of Oceanside Sanitary District v. Nassau County Civil Service Commission

121 A.D.2d 494, 503 N.Y.S.2d 437, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58472
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 16, 1986
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 121 A.D.2d 494 (Board of Commissioners of Oceanside Sanitary District v. Nassau County Civil Service Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Board of Commissioners of Oceanside Sanitary District v. Nassau County Civil Service Commission, 121 A.D.2d 494, 503 N.Y.S.2d 437, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58472 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Nassau County Civil Service Commission, dated October 30, 1984, which reversed a determination of petitioner Board of Commissioners of Oceanside Sanitary District, No. 7, dated May 30, 1984, which, after a hearing, had found the respondent William Stuber guilty of a charge that he operated one of the petitioner’s sanitation trucks at an excessive rate of speed, and in a careless, reckless and dangerous manner, and imposed a penalty of 30 days’ suspension without pay and reclassification of his job title, without loss in seniority.

Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with one bill of costs.

Although Special Term improperly transferred the instant proceeding to this court pursuant to CPLR 7803 (4) and 7804 (g) since the petitioner did not raise a question of substantial evidence in its petition (see, Matter of Pauling v Smith, 46 AD2d 759), we will nevertheless decide the matter (see, Matter of Aversano v Two Family Use Bd., 117 AD2d 665).

After reviewing the record pursuant to our power to review determinations such as that made by the Civil Service Commission in the case at bar, it cannot be said that the determination of the commission was "purely arbitrary” (see, Matter of Pauling v Smith, 46 AD2d 759, supra; Matter of Barbarito v Moses, 31 AD2d 898), especially in light of the contradictory testimony given by two of the petitioner’s witnesses at the hearing who observed the accident. On the other hand we reject the respondent Stuber’s contention that this proceeding was brought frivolously so as to warrant the imposition of counsel fees. Weinstein, J. P., Niehoff, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Abbatiello v. Williams
230 A.D.2d 790 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
New York City Department of Environmental Protection v. New York City Civil Service Commission
164 A.D.2d 834 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 A.D.2d 494, 503 N.Y.S.2d 437, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-commissioners-of-oceanside-sanitary-district-v-nassau-county-nyappdiv-1986.