Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Kaiser
71 A. 1133, 76 N.J.L. 829, 47 Vroom 829, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 223
Opinion
The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of the Chief Justice. 46 Vroom 9.
The opinion cited the ease of Virtue v. Freeholders of Essex, 38 Vroom 139. We have not considered that case, and express no opinion thereon.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Eeed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Yoorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 15.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Kaiser, 71 A. 1133, 76 N.J.L. 829, 47 Vroom 829, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 223 (N.J. 1908).
71 A. 1133 (Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Kaiser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Lanzaro
638 A.2d 931 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1992)