Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Kaiser

71 A. 1133, 76 N.J.L. 829, 47 Vroom 829, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 223
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 16, 1908·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of the Chief Justice. 46 Vroom 9.

The opinion cited the ease of Virtue v. Freeholders of Essex, 38 Vroom 139. We have not considered that case, and express no opinion thereon.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Eeed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Yoorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 15.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Kaiser, 71 A. 1133, 76 N.J.L. 829, 47 Vroom 829, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 223 (N.J. 1908).

71 A. 1133 (Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Kaiser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Lanzaro
638 A.2d 931 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1992)