Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Buck

7 A. 860, 49 N.J.L. 228, 1886 N.J. LEXIS 8
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 15, 1886·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Beasley, Chief Justice.

The statute entitled “An act to make certain roads, constructed by commissioners under the authority of the legislature, county roads, and to provide for the payment of the expenses of constructing by the county, and for the mode of maintaining and repairing the same” (Pamph. L. 1883, p. 225), is the foundation of the suit, and as we think that this act is applicable to the county of Hudson alone, and can never be applied in any other locality, and is therefore plainly unconstitutional, the judgment in this case must be reversed.

For affirmance — None. For reversal — The Chief Justice, Depue, Dixon, Magie, Parker, Reed, Scudder, Van Syckel, Brown, Clement, Cole, Whitaker. 12.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Buck, 7 A. 860, 49 N.J.L. 228, 1886 N.J. LEXIS 8 (N.J. 1886).

7 A. 860 (Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Buck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Phair v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corporation
74 F. Supp. 693 (D. New Jersey, 1947)
United States v. Britten
161 F.2d 921 (Third Circuit, 1947)
Trafton v. Bainbridge
9 A.2d 306 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1939)
Hagerty v. Work
166 P. 1139 (Washington Supreme Court, 1917)
Singleton v. Eureka County
35 P. 833 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1894)