Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

135 A. 921, 5 N.J. Misc. 232, 1927 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 308

DecidedFebruary 7, 1927

StatusPublished

This text of 135 A. 921 (Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 135 A. 921, 5 N.J. Misc. 232, 1927 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 308 (N.J. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A certiorari was allowed to review an order of the board of public utility commissioners dated September 30th, 1926, dismissing the prosecutor’s petition praying for an order of the board directing the Public Service Railway Company to repair a portion of its tracks and surrounding pavements, on Springfield avenue and Seven Bridges road to Morns avenue, in the township of Millburn, Essex county, New Jersey.

When the order in this case was made, the board of commissioners filed a written decision stating the reasons, which moved the board to make the order. Record, page 11. In that decision, the facts are quite fully and clearly stated. The statute under which the order is sought is cited, viz., Pamph. L. 1911, p. 374, § 17, and the reasons given for the making of the order dismissing the prosecutor’s petition. [233]*233We think no further discussions of the points involved is required, other than what is contained in the board’s written decision. Eor the reasons therein stated, the order of the board, dated September 30th, 1926, dismissing the prosecutor’s petition, is affirmed, and the writ of certiorari is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

A certiorari was allowed to review an order of the board of public utility commissioners dated September 30th, 1926, dismissing the prosecutor’s petition praying for an order of the board directing the Public Service Railway Company to repair a portion of its tracks and surrounding pavements, on Springfield avenue and Seven Bridges road to Morns avenue, in the township of Millburn, Essex county, New Jersey.

When the order in this case was made, the board of commissioners filed a written decision stating the reasons, which moved the board to make the order. Record, page 11. In that decision, the facts are quite fully and clearly stated. The statute under which the order is sought is cited, viz., Pamph. L. 1911, p. 374, § 17, and the reasons given for the making of the order dismissing the prosecutor’s petition. [233]*233We think no further discussions of the points involved is required, other than what is contained in the board’s written decision. Eor the reasons therein stated, the order of the board, dated September 30th, 1926, dismissing the prosecutor’s petition, is affirmed, and the writ of certiorari is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 A. 921, 5 N.J. Misc. 232, 1927 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-chosen-freeholders-v-board-of-public-utility-commissioners-nj-1927.