Boalt Properties, Inc. v. Ronald J. Gordon-Smith Corp.

441 So. 2d 183, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24265
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 23, 1983·No. No. 82-2446·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amended Complaint, based upon the theory of an intentional interference with a business relationship, was dismissed. Plaintiffs appeal. We reverse.

We have surveyed the complaint, mindful that the well-pleaded allegations must be accepted as true. Suffice it to say, we feel that its content was legally sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss. We reverse upon authority of Franklin v. Brown, 159 So.2d 893 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964); Mead Corp. v. Mason, 191 So.2d 592 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1966); Symon v. J. Rolfe Davis, Inc., 245 So.2d 278 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971); and Krieger v. Ocean Properties, Ltd., 387 So.2d 1012 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).

REVERSED

DOWNEY, BERANEK and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boalt Properties, Inc. v. Ronald J. Gordon-Smith Corp., 441 So. 2d 183, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24265 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

441 So. 2d 183 (Boalt Properties, Inc. v. Ronald J. Gordon-Smith Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Franklin v. Brown
159 So. 2d 893 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Krieger v. Ocean Properties, Ltd.
387 So. 2d 1012 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Symon v. J. Rolfe Davis, Inc.
245 So. 2d 278 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Mead Corporation v. Mason
191 So. 2d 592 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)