Boalt Properties, Inc. v. Ronald J. Gordon-Smith Corp.
This text of 441 So. 2d 183 (Boalt Properties, Inc. v. Ronald J. Gordon-Smith Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amended Complaint, based upon the theory of an intentional interference with a business relationship, was dismissed. Plaintiffs appeal. We reverse.
We have surveyed the complaint, mindful that the well-pleaded allegations must be accepted as true. Suffice it to say, we feel that its content was legally sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss. We reverse upon authority of Franklin v. Brown, 159 So.2d 893 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964); Mead Corp. v. Mason, 191 So.2d 592 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1966); Symon v. J. Rolfe Davis, Inc., 245 So.2d 278 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971); and Krieger v. Ocean Properties, Ltd., 387 So.2d 1012 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).
REVERSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
441 So. 2d 183, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boalt-properties-inc-v-ronald-j-gordon-smith-corp-fladistctapp-1983.