Boalt Properties, Inc. v. Ronald J. Gordon-Smith Corp.

441 So. 2d 183, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24265
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 23, 1983
DocketNo. 82-2446
StatusPublished

This text of 441 So. 2d 183 (Boalt Properties, Inc. v. Ronald J. Gordon-Smith Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boalt Properties, Inc. v. Ronald J. Gordon-Smith Corp., 441 So. 2d 183, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24265 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amended Complaint, based upon the theory of an intentional interference with a business relationship, was dismissed. Plaintiffs appeal. We reverse.

We have surveyed the complaint, mindful that the well-pleaded allegations must be accepted as true. Suffice it to say, we feel that its content was legally sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss. We reverse upon authority of Franklin v. Brown, 159 So.2d 893 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964); Mead Corp. v. Mason, 191 So.2d 592 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1966); Symon v. J. Rolfe Davis, Inc., 245 So.2d 278 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971); and Krieger v. Ocean Properties, Ltd., 387 So.2d 1012 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).

REVERSED

DOWNEY, BERANEK and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Franklin v. Brown
159 So. 2d 893 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Krieger v. Ocean Properties, Ltd.
387 So. 2d 1012 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Symon v. J. Rolfe Davis, Inc.
245 So. 2d 278 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Mead Corporation v. Mason
191 So. 2d 592 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
441 So. 2d 183, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boalt-properties-inc-v-ronald-j-gordon-smith-corp-fladistctapp-1983.