Boal v. Hayduk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Boal v. Hayduk

37 A.D.2d 860, 327 N.Y.S.2d 564, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3226

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 22, 1971

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 37 A.D.2d 860 (Boal v. Hayduk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boal v. Hayduk, 37 A.D.2d 860, 327 N.Y.S.2d 564, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3226 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

In consolidated proceedings, the first above-entitled one to validate petitions designating petitioner Boal as the candidate of the Independent Party in the general election to be held on November 2,1971 for the public office of County Legislator, District 4, Westchester County, and the second above-entitled one to invalidate said petitions, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 13, 1971, which adjudged the nominating petitions valid and directed that the name of petitioner Boal he placed on the ballot as such candidate. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Rabin, P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Latham and Gulotta, JJ., concur. [68 Misc 2d 234.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In consolidated proceedings, the first above-entitled one to validate petitions designating petitioner Boal as the candidate of the Independent Party in the general election to be held on November 2,1971 for the public office of County Legislator, District 4, Westchester County, and the second above-entitled one to invalidate said petitions, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 13, 1971, which adjudged the nominating petitions valid and directed that the name of petitioner Boal he placed on the ballot as such candidate. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Rabin, P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Latham and Gulotta, JJ., concur. [68 Misc 2d 234.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 A.D.2d 860, 327 N.Y.S.2d 564, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boal-v-hayduk-nyappdiv-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack