Boak v. Boak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Boak v. Boak

186 A.D.2d 1074, 590 N.Y.S.2d 805, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11737

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 7, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 186 A.D.2d 1074 (Boak v. Boak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boak v. Boak, 186 A.D.2d 1074, 590 N.Y.S.2d 805, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11737 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: In this action seeking a divorce on the ground of cruelty, the court properly denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. The complaint complies with the specificity requirement of CPLR 3016 (c). The court erred, however, in denying defendant’s request for interim counsel fees. Domestic Relations Law § 237 provides that an award of counsel fees may be made in order to adjust any substantial disparity in the parties’ resources and enable the moving spouse to defend the action (see, Wolf v Wolf, 160 AD2d 555, 556). We therefore set aside so much of the order as denied interim counsel fees and remit for the award of an appropriate amount. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Stone, J. — Counsel Fees.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: In this action seeking a divorce on the ground of cruelty, the court properly denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. The complaint complies with the specificity requirement of CPLR 3016 (c). The court erred, however, in denying defendant’s request for interim counsel fees. Domestic Relations Law § 237 provides that an award of counsel fees may be made in order to adjust any substantial disparity in the parties’ resources and enable the moving spouse to defend the action (see, Wolf v Wolf, 160 AD2d 555, 556). We therefore set aside so much of the order as denied interim counsel fees and remit for the award of an appropriate amount. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Stone, J. — Counsel Fees.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Boehm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 A.D.2d 1074, 590 N.Y.S.2d 805, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boak-v-boak-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack