Bo v. Bo

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bo v. Bo

786 So. 2d 1291, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8801, 2001 WL 716756

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 27, 2001

DocketNo. 3D01-146

StatusPublished

This text of 786 So. 2d 1291 (Bo v. Bo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bo v. Bo, 786 So. 2d 1291, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8801, 2001 WL 716756 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss or stay the action on forum non conveniens grounds. We find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s determination that the courts of Paraguay do not constitute a reasonable alternative forum. Kinney System, Inc. v. Continental Ins. Co., 674 So.2d 86 (Fla.1996); Millon Air, Inc. v. Ferrin, 744 So.2d 557 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). See also Mendes v. Dowelanco Indus., LTDA., 651 So.2d 776 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss or stay the action on forum non conveniens grounds. We find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s determination that the courts of Paraguay do not constitute a reasonable alternative forum. Kinney System, Inc. v. Continental Ins. Co., 674 So.2d 86 (Fla.1996); Millon Air, Inc. v. Ferrin, 744 So.2d 557 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). See also Mendes v. Dowelanco Indus., LTDA., 651 So.2d 776 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

786 So. 2d 1291, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8801, 2001 WL 716756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bo-v-bo-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack