BNSF Railway Company v. Stacy Wipff

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in BNSF Railway Company v. Stacy Wipff. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 9903 →

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 8, 2013·No. 02-12-00204-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00204-CV

BNSF Railway Company § From the 96th District Court

§ of Tarrant County (96-249024-10) v. § August 8, 2013

Stacy Wipff § Opinion by Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the

trial court is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court for a new trial.

It is further ordered that appellee Stacy Wipff shall pay all costs of this

appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _________________________________ Justice Lee Gabriel

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00204-CV

BNSF Railway Company § From the 96th District Court

§ of Tarrant County (96-249024-10) v. § August 8, 2013

Stacy Wipff § Opinion by Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the

trial court is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court for a new trial.

It is further ordered that appellee Stacy Wipff shall pay all costs of this

appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _________________________________ Justice Lee Gabriel

BNSF Railway Company v. Stacy Wipff, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

BNSF Railway Company v. Stacy Wipff (BNSF Railway Company v. Stacy Wipff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.