BNSF Railway Company v. James E. Phillips

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in BNSF Railway Company v. James E. Phillips. Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 5533
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 22, 2014·No. 02-11-00250-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00250-CV

BNSF Railway Company § From the 236th District Court § of Tarrant County (236-223592-07)

v. § May 22, 2014 § Opinion by Justice Dauphinot James E. Phillips § Dissent by Justice Meier

JUDGMENT ON REHEARING

After considering the Appellant’s motions for rehearing and reconsideration en banc, Appellee’s response, and Appellant’s reply, this court denies the motion for reconsideration en banc in a separate order today, and we deny the motion for rehearing. We withdraw our August 1, 2013 opinions and judgment and substitute the following.

This court has again considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that Appellant BNSF Railway Company shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot______________ Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BNSF Railway Company v. James E. Phillips, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

BNSF Railway Company v. James E. Phillips (BNSF Railway Company v. James E. Phillips) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.