BNSF Railway Company v. James E. Phillips
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-11-00250-CV
BNSF Railway Company § From the 236th District Court
§ of Tarrant County (236-223592-07)
v. § May 22, 2014
§ Opinion by Justice Dauphinot
James E. Phillips § Dissent by Justice Meier
JUDGMENT ON REHEARING
After considering the Appellant’s motions for rehearing and reconsideration
en banc, Appellee’s response, and Appellant’s reply, this court denies the motion
for reconsideration en banc in a separate order today, and we deny the motion
for rehearing. We withdraw our August 1, 2013 opinions and judgment and
substitute the following.
This court has again considered the record on appeal in this case and
holds that there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the
judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
It is further ordered that Appellant BNSF Railway Company shall pay all
costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS
By _/s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot______________ Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
BNSF Railway Company v. James E. Phillips (BNSF Railway Company v. James E. Phillips) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.