BNB Construction, Inc. v. Nicon Construction, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

BNB Construction, Inc. v. Nicon Construction, Inc.

13 So. 3d 1107, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9623, 2009 WL 2031302

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 15, 2009

Docket4D09-1137

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 13 So. 3d 1107 (BNB Construction, Inc. v. Nicon Construction, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

BNB Construction, Inc. v. Nicon Construction, Inc., 13 So. 3d 1107, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9623, 2009 WL 2031302 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners, BNB Construction, Inc. and Brian A. Bent, seek review of an order that requires them to deposit funds from four bank accounts into the court registry. As petitioners were not parties to the litigation below when the order issued, we exercise certiorari review and grant the petition. The funds paid by Arch Insurance Company to Stonebridge Gardens, Section Two, Condominium Association, Inc. did not remain specifically identifiable in petitioners’ various business and personal accounts to permit the relief granted. M.I. Indus. USA Inc. v. Attorneys’ Title Ins. Fund, Inc., 6 So.3d 627 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

TAYLOR, HAZOURI and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners, BNB Construction, Inc. and Brian A. Bent, seek review of an order that requires them to deposit funds from four bank accounts into the court registry. As petitioners were not parties to the litigation below when the order issued, we exercise certiorari review and grant the petition. The funds paid by Arch Insurance Company to Stonebridge Gardens, Section Two, Condominium Association, Inc. did not remain specifically identifiable in petitioners’ various business and personal accounts to permit the relief granted. M.I. Indus. USA Inc. v. Attorneys’ Title Ins. Fund, Inc., 6 So.3d 627 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

TAYLOR, HAZOURI and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 So. 3d 1107, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9623, 2009 WL 2031302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bnb-construction-inc-v-nicon-construction-inc-fladistctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack