B.M.S. Broadcasting, Inc. v. Simplex, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

B.M.S. Broadcasting, Inc. v. Simplex, Inc.

504 So. 2d 513, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 859, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7389

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 26, 1987

DocketNo. 86-81

StatusPublished

This text of 504 So. 2d 513 (B.M.S. Broadcasting, Inc. v. Simplex, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

B.M.S. Broadcasting, Inc. v. Simplex, Inc., 504 So. 2d 513, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 859, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7389 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In view of counsel for appellant’s response to this court’s order, we strike from Appellant’s Initial Brief and Reply Brief those paragraphs specifically quoted in our order, which counsel admits are misrepresentations of the record in this case. We choose not to impose further sanctions, however, we serve notice to all practitioners who appear before us that future cases may be dealt with more harshly. Although it is perhaps old-fashioned, it is still essential that, first and foremost, lawyers adhere to their traditional role as officers of the court.

Finding no error with the judgment appealed, it is

AFFIRMED.

UPCHURCH, C.J., and COBB and SHARP, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In view of counsel for appellant’s response to this court’s order, we strike from Appellant’s Initial Brief and Reply Brief those paragraphs specifically quoted in our order, which counsel admits are misrepresentations of the record in this case. We choose not to impose further sanctions, however, we serve notice to all practitioners who appear before us that future cases may be dealt with more harshly. Although it is perhaps old-fashioned, it is still essential that, first and foremost, lawyers adhere to their traditional role as officers of the court.

Finding no error with the judgment appealed, it is

AFFIRMED.

UPCHURCH, C.J., and COBB and SHARP, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

504 So. 2d 513, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 859, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bms-broadcasting-inc-v-simplex-inc-fladistctapp-1987.