BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. M & N Transport, LLC

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nebraska
DecidedMarch 4, 2020
Docket4:20-cv-03006
StatusUnknown

This text of BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. M & N Transport, LLC (BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. M & N Transport, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. M & N Transport, LLC, (D. Neb. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

BMO HARRIS BANK N.A.,

4:20-CV-3006 Plaintiff,

vs. ORDER

M & N TRANSPORT, LLC and MICHAEL TOMLINSON,

Defendants.

This matter is before the Court on the Report & Recommendation of the United States Bankruptcy Judge (filing 9). No objections to that report and recommendation have been filed. The failure to file an objection eliminates not only the need for de novo review, but any review by the Court. See Leonard v. Dorsey & Whitney LLP, 553 F.3d 609 (8th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, the Court will adopt the report and recommendation of the United States Bankruptcy Judge that the referral of this matter to the Bankruptcy Court be withdrawn to proceed with the litigation against defendant M & N Transport, LLC, while staying the case as to defendant Michael Tomlinson until the automatic stay is no longer in effect or relief from the automatic stay is requested and obtained from the Bankruptcy Court.1

1 The parties should know, however, that the Court may revisit the scope of the bankruptcy stay depending on the degree to which the debtor's interests are implicated by the legal theories pursued against M & N Transport, LLC. See In re Panther Mountain Land Dev., LLC, 686 F.3d 916, 923-24 (8th Cir. 2012) (discussing possibility of expanding automatic stay when presented with unusual circumstances with great identity of interest between parties.) IT IS ORDERED:

1. The report and recommendation of the United States Bankruptcy Judge (filing 9) recommending withdrawal of the reference is adopted.

2. Reference of this case to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nebraska is withdrawn.

3. This case is administratively reopened.

4, This case is stayed as to Michael Tomlinson until the stay is no longer in effect pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362, or relief from the automatic stay is requested and obtained from the United States Bankruptcy Court.

5. The parties are directed to inform the Court every 60 days of the status of the bankruptcy proceeding.

6. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter an initial status report deadline of May 4, 2020.

Dated this 4th day of March, 2020. BY E COU Ar □□ ABAD Jéfin M. Gerrard Ghief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Leonard v. Dorsey & Whitney LLP
553 F.3d 609 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. M & N Transport, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bmo-harris-bank-na-v-m-n-transport-llc-ned-2020.