BMO Harris Bank, N.A. v. Billan-Pahal Corporation

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 BMO HARRIS BANK, N.A., Case No. 1:19-cv-00140-DAD-EPG 9 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS GURDEEP 10] v. BILLAN, RANJODH BILLAN, AND BILLAN-PAHAL CORPORATION 11 WITHOUT PREJUDICE BILLAN-PAHAL CORPORATION, et al., 12 (ECF No. 19) Defendants. 13 14 15 On November 8, 2019, Plaintiff, BMO Harris Bank, N.A., filed a notice of voluntary 16 dismissal without prejudice of Defendants Gurdeep Billan, Ranjodh Billan, and Billan-Pahal 17 Corporation. (ECF No. 19.) Defendants Gurdeep Billan, Ranjodh Billan, and Billan-Pahal 1g | Corporation have not filed either an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, in 19 light of the notice, the case against Defendants Gurdeep Billan, Ranjodh Billan, and Billan-Pahal 29 Corporation has ended and they are dismissed from this action without prejudice. See Fed. R. 91 Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). The Clerk of 79 the Court is respectfully directed to designate on the docket that Defendants Gurdeep Billan, 23 Ranjodh Billan, and Billan-Pahal Corporation have been terminated from this action as of the 74 date this order is entered. T IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: _November 13, 2019 [sf Sy — 37 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE