BMO Bank N.A. v. SBFS Trucking, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided April 15, 2025·No. 1:24-cv-01260·Unknown

Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 BMO BANK N.A., Case No. 1:24-cv-01260-SAB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING APRIL 24, 2025 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND 13 v. REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 14 SBFS TRUCKING INC., et al., THIRTY DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendants.

16 17 Plaintiff commenced this action on October 16, 2024. (ECF No. 1.) On April 11, 2025, 18 the Clerk of the Court entered default against Defendants SBFS Trucking Inc. and Barinder 19 Singh Gill. (ECF Nos. 17, 18.) The scheduling conference in this matter is currently set for 20 April 24, 2025. (ECF No. 14.) 21 Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 55, obtaining a default judgment is a two- 22 step process. Yue v. Storage Technology Corp., No. 3:07-cv-05850, 2008 WL 361142, *2 (N.D. 23 Cal. Feb. 11, 2008). Entry of default is appropriate as to any party against whom a judgment for 24 affirmative relief is sought that has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by the Federal 25 Rules of Civil Procedure and where that fact is made to appear by affidavit or otherwise. Fed. R. 26 Civ. P. 55(a). After entry of default, a plaintiff can seek entry of default judgment. Fed. R. Civ. 27 P. 55(b)(1) and (2). “Default judgments are generally disfavored, and whenever it is reasonably possible, cases should be decided upon their merits.” In re Hammer, 940 F.2d 524, (9th Cir. 1 | 1991) (cleaned up). 2 As the Defendants in this matter are in default, the Court shall vacate the initial 3 | scheduling conference and set a deadline for a motion for default judgment to be filed. 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 5 1. Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall file a 6 motion for default judgment; 7 2. The initial scheduling conference set for April 24, 2025, is VACATED; and 8 3. Plaintiff is advised that the failure to comply with this order shall result in a 9 recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. 10 i IT IS SO ORDERED. DAM Le 12 | Dated: _April 15, 2025 _ Of STANLEY A. BOONE 13 United States Magistrate Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BMO Bank N.A. v. SBFS Trucking, Inc., (E.D. Cal. 2025).

BMO Bank N.A. v. SBFS Trucking, Inc. (BMO Bank N.A. v. SBFS Trucking, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Garnier v. Porter
27 P. 55 (California Supreme Court, 1891)