Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/BMAB East Tower, Inc. v. Testwell Craig Laboratories & Consultants, Inc.

BMAB East Tower, Inc. v. Testwell Craig Laboratories & Consultants, Inc.

835 So. 2d 1211, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 220, 2003 WL 118496
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 15, 2003
DocketNo. 3D02-1507
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 835 So. 2d 1211 (BMAB East Tower, Inc. v. Testwell Craig Laboratories & Consultants, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
BMAB East Tower, Inc. v. Testwell Craig Laboratories & Consultants, Inc., 835 So. 2d 1211, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 220, 2003 WL 118496 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the record, we conclude that appellant’s amended complaint against appellees is not barred by the statute of limitations because it relates back to the date of filing of the fourth-party complaint. See McKee v. Fort Lauderdale Produce Co., 503 So.2d 412 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), rev. denied, 513 So.2d 1061 (Fla.1987); Gatins v. Sebastian Inlet Tax Dist., 453 So.2d 871 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Caduceus Properties, LLC v. William G. Graney, P.E.
137 So. 3d 987 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2014)
Graney v. Caduceus Properties, LLC
91 So. 3d 220 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
835 So. 2d 1211, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 220, 2003 WL 118496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bmab-east-tower-inc-v-testwell-craig-laboratories-consultants-inc-fladistctapp-2003.