B/M Redev. Corp. v. Serrano

488 A.2d 848, 3 Conn. App. 409, 1985 Conn. App. LEXIS 881
Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided March 19, 1985·No. 3277·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal by the defendant from the judgment of the trial court granting immediate possession to the plaintiff in a summary process action. A memorandum of decision was not filed in this case, and the defendant did not seek an articulation of the basis of the trial court’s decision. Practice Book § 3082.

The defendant bore the burden of securing an adequate appellate record. Barnes v. Barnes, 190 Conn. 491, 493, 460 A.2d 1302 (1983). It could have accomplished this by obtaining an articulation under Practice Book § 3082, but it did not. In re Juvenile Appeal (85-1), 3 Conn. App. 158, 161, 485 A.2d 1355 (1985). Under these circumstances, we decline to remand this case sua sponte for articulation. Urban v. Leggio, [410] 1 Conn. App. 226, 228, 470 A.2d 1226 (1984). Since the record before us is completely inadequate, we have no basis upon which to find error.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

B/M Redev. Corp. v. Serrano, 488 A.2d 848, 3 Conn. App. 409, 1985 Conn. App. LEXIS 881 (Colo. Ct. App. 1985).

488 A.2d 848 (B/M Redev. Corp. v. Serrano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Crawford
521 A.2d 1034 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1987)
Bass v. Pine Hill Golf Club, Inc.
518 A.2d 680 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1986)
Jazlowiecki v. Cyr
492 A.2d 516 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1985)