B/M Redev. Corp. v. Serrano

Connecticut Appellate Court

B/M Redev. Corp. v. Serrano

488 A.2d 848, 3 Conn. App. 409, 1985 Conn. App. LEXIS 881

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedMarch 19, 1985

Docket3277

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 488 A.2d 848 (B/M Redev. Corp. v. Serrano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

B/M Redev. Corp. v. Serrano, 488 A.2d 848, 3 Conn. App. 409, 1985 Conn. App. LEXIS 881 (Colo. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal by the defendant from the judgment of the trial court granting immediate possession to the plaintiff in a summary process action. A memorandum of decision was not filed in this case, and the defendant did not seek an articulation of the basis of the trial court’s decision. Practice Book § 3082.

The defendant bore the burden of securing an adequate appellate record. Barnes v. Barnes, 190 Conn. 491, 493, 460 A.2d 1302 (1983). It could have accomplished this by obtaining an articulation under Practice Book § 3082, but it did not. In re Juvenile Appeal (85-1), 3 Conn. App. 158, 161, 485 A.2d 1355 (1985). Under these circumstances, we decline to remand this case sua sponte for articulation. Urban v. Leggio, [410]*4101 Conn. App. 226, 228, 470 A.2d 1226 (1984). Since the record before us is completely inadequate, we have no basis upon which to find error.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal by the defendant from the judgment of the trial court granting immediate possession to the plaintiff in a summary process action. A memorandum of decision was not filed in this case, and the defendant did not seek an articulation of the basis of the trial court’s decision. Practice Book § 3082.

The defendant bore the burden of securing an adequate appellate record. Barnes v. Barnes, 190 Conn. 491, 493, 460 A.2d 1302 (1983). It could have accomplished this by obtaining an articulation under Practice Book § 3082, but it did not. In re Juvenile Appeal (85-1), 3 Conn. App. 158, 161, 485 A.2d 1355 (1985). Under these circumstances, we decline to remand this case sua sponte for articulation. Urban v. Leggio, [410]*4101 Conn. App. 226, 228, 470 A.2d 1226 (1984). Since the record before us is completely inadequate, we have no basis upon which to find error.

There is no error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

488 A.2d 848, 3 Conn. App. 409, 1985 Conn. App. LEXIS 881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bm-redev-corp-v-serrano-connappct-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack