B&M Kingstone, LLC v. Mega International Commercial Bank Co.

41 N.E.3d 74, 26 N.Y.3d 995, 19 N.Y.S.3d 216, 2015 NY Slip Op 88646, 2015 N.Y. LEXIS 3580
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 27, 2015
StatusPublished

This text of 41 N.E.3d 74 (B&M Kingstone, LLC v. Mega International Commercial Bank Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
B&M Kingstone, LLC v. Mega International Commercial Bank Co., 41 N.E.3d 74, 26 N.Y.3d 995, 19 N.Y.S.3d 216, 2015 NY Slip Op 88646, 2015 N.Y. LEXIS 3580 (N.Y. 2015).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 N.E.3d 74, 26 N.Y.3d 995, 19 N.Y.S.3d 216, 2015 NY Slip Op 88646, 2015 N.Y. LEXIS 3580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bm-kingstone-llc-v-mega-international-commercial-bank-co-ny-2015.