Blythe v. Welborn

223 N.C. 857
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 19, 1943·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff, employee, brings tbis action under tbe provisions of tbe Workmen’s Compensation Act, against tbe employer and insurance carrier, to obtain compensation for injuries.

There is evidence to support tbe findings of fact by tbe Commission, upon wbicb tbe liability of tbe defendants is declared, and we find no error in tbe conclusions of law, or in tbe judgment of tbe court below affirming tbe award.. Eller v. Leather Co., 222 N. C., 23, 21 S. E. (2d), 809; Blevins v. Teer, 220 N. C., 135, 16 S. E., (2d), 659; Beach McLean, 219 N. C., 521, 14 S. E. (2d), 515.

Tbe judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blythe v. Welborn, 223 N.C. 857 (N.C. 1943).

223 N.C. 857 (Blythe v. Welborn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beach v. . McLean
14 S.E.2d 515 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1941)
Blevins v. . Teer
16 S.E.2d 659 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1941)
Eller v. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co.
21 S.E.2d 809 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)