Blythe v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Blythe v. State

189 S.E. 687, 55 Ga. App. 193, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 37

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 2, 1937

Docket25994

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 189 S.E. 687 (Blythe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blythe v. State, 189 S.E. 687, 55 Ga. App. 193, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 37 (Ga. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

MacIntyre, J.

In a criminal case the bill of exceptions must be presented to the judge within twenty days from the date of the judgment complained of. In this case the judgment excepted to was the overruling of a motion for new trial. As disclosed by the bill of exceptions and the record, the date of that judgment was August 15, 1936; and the bill of exceptions, as shown by the recital therein, was presented to the judge on September 14, 1936. The bill of exceptions not having been tendered within the time required by law, this court has no jurisdiction of the case. Writ of error dismissed.

Broyles, C. J., and Guerry, J., concur. Wallcer B. Flournoy, James F. Short, for plaintiff in error. A. J. Perryman, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacIntyre, J.

In a criminal case the bill of exceptions must be presented to the judge within twenty days from the date of the judgment complained of. In this case the judgment excepted to was the overruling of a motion for new trial. As disclosed by the bill of exceptions and the record, the date of that judgment was August 15, 1936; and the bill of exceptions, as shown by the recital therein, was presented to the judge on September 14, 1936. The bill of exceptions not having been tendered within the time required by law, this court has no jurisdiction of the case. Writ of error dismissed.

Broyles, C. J., and Guerry, J., concur. Wallcer B. Flournoy, James F. Short, for plaintiff in error. A. J. Perryman, solicitor-general, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 S.E. 687, 55 Ga. App. 193, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blythe-v-state-gactapp-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack