Blythe v. State

705 So. 2d 128, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 564, 1998 WL 25493
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 27, 1998
DocketNo. 97-935
StatusPublished

This text of 705 So. 2d 128 (Blythe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blythe v. State, 705 So. 2d 128, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 564, 1998 WL 25493 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of the order which denied his motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm as to the victim injury assessment argument. However, the concurrent 17 year sentences imposed for the second degree felony charges exceed the statutory maximum of 15 years. § 775.082(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (1993). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for resentencing. Pearson v. State, 660 So.2d 406 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Appellant need not be present for resentencing.

MINER, MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pearson v. State
660 So. 2d 406 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
705 So. 2d 128, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 564, 1998 WL 25493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blythe-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.