Blythe v. . Gash
19 S.E. 640, 114 N.C. 659
Opinion
The very carefully prepared and interesting brief of the defendants’ counsel has been fully considered by the Court, but fails to satisfy us that the judgment is barred or that its lien does, not continue so as to constitute a charge upon the land described in the complaint. Neither do we think the liability of Mrs. Gash’s estate is to be postponed under the circumstances of this case until the proceeds of the' property of the alleged surety in the judgment can be followed and subjected. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blythe v. . Gash, 19 S.E. 640, 114 N.C. 659 (N.C. 1894).
19 S.E. 640 (Blythe v. . Gash) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Town of Tarboro v. Pender
69 S.E. 425 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1910)