Blythe v. Blythe

592 So. 2d 356, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 253, 1992 WL 4461
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Blythe v. Blythe. Read the opinion of the Court — 592 So. 2d 353
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 15, 1992·No. No. 91-0573·Published

Opinion

POLEN, Judge.

The former husband appeals a post-judgment order adjudicating him in contempt for failure to pay permanent periodic alimony as ordered by the court. This court, in a separate opinion issued today, has reversed, in part; the final judgment of dissolution, with instructions to the trial court to revisit the propriety of the award of permanent periodic alimony. Blythe v. Blythe, 592 So.2d 353 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Because the award of permanent periodic alimony was reversed, the order holding the former husband in contempt for failure to pay that alimony is erroneous. See, e.g., Blum v. Blum, 382 So.2d 52 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Winner v. Winner, 376 So.2d 924 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and DELL, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blythe v. Blythe, 592 So. 2d 356, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 253, 1992 WL 4461 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

592 So. 2d 356 (Blythe v. Blythe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blum v. Blum
382 So. 2d 52 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Blythe v. Blythe
592 So. 2d 353 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Winner v. Winner
376 So. 2d 924 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)