Blymyer v. Meader

Hamilton Circuit Court

Blymyer v. Meader

9 Ohio Cir. Dec. 173

Hamilton Circuit Court·Decided July 1, 1897·Published

Opinion

Smith, J.

The question presented in this case is identical with that passed upon in Thompson, admx. v. Building Co., 7 Ohio Circ. Dec., 68; but different counsel appearing in this case, and the question presented being an important one, we have heard and considered it again. We are of the opinion, however, that the doctrine announced in the case referred to was correct, and the motion to dismiss the appeal in this case will be sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, J.

The question presented in this case is identical with that passed upon in Thompson, admx. v. Building Co., 7 Ohio Circ. Dec., 68; but different counsel appearing in this case, and the question presented being an important one, we have heard and considered it again. We are of the opinion, however, that the doctrine announced in the case referred to was correct, and the motion to dismiss the appeal in this case will be sustained.

Blymyer v. Meader, 9 Ohio Cir. Dec. 173 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1897).

Pincite

9 Ohio Cir. Dec. 173 (Blymyer v. Meader) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.