Blydenburgh v. Walmart Stores East, LP

CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Florida
DecidedAugust 3, 2022
Docket2:21-cv-00493
StatusUnknown

This text of Blydenburgh v. Walmart Stores East, LP (Blydenburgh v. Walmart Stores East, LP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blydenburgh v. Walmart Stores East, LP, (M.D. Fla. 2022).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

JOHN BLYDENBURGH,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 2:21-cv-493-SPC-NPM

WALMART STORES EAST, LP,

Defendant. / ORDER1 Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff failed to respond. So the Motion is unopposed, and all supported facts are deemed undisputed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e)(2); Local Rule 3.01(c); (Docs. 22 at 4; 32 at 2). Courts cannot grant summary judgment by default because movant must always show it is entitled to the ruling. United States v. 5800 SW 74th Ave., 363 F.3d 1099, 1101-02 (11th Cir. 2004). Still, for the reasons explained in Sections III(a)-(b) of Defendant’s Motion, judgment is proper. See 10A Charles Alan Wright & Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2719 (4th ed. 2022) (“The court retains discretion as to the form and detail of its statement of reasons.”). Specifically, Plaintiff tripped over this pallet:

1 Disclaimer: Papers hyperlinked to CM/ECF may be subject to PACER fees. By using hyperlinks, the Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or their services or products, nor does it have any agreements with them. The Court is not responsible for a hyperlink’s functionality, and a failed hyperlink does not affect this Order. ro gear

(Doc. 31 at 4). But the condition was so open and obvious that Defendant (1) owed no duty to warn; (2) warned of any danger; and (8) did not breach a duty to maintain because the pallet was not dangerous and, even if so, Plaintiff should have discovered it. So the Court grants summary judgment. Brookie

v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 213 So. 38d 1129, 1132-37 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017). Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: 1. Defendant’s Motion for Final Summary Judgment (Doc. 31) is GRANTED. 2. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment, deny any pending motions as moot, terminate all deadlines, and close the case. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on August 3, 2022.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies: All Parties of Record

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Blydenburgh v. Walmart Stores East, LP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blydenburgh-v-walmart-stores-east-lp-flmd-2022.