Blydenburgh v. Magone
40 F. 573, 1889 U.S. App. LEXIS 2548
This text of 40 F. 573 (Blydenburgh v. Magone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Blydenburgh v. Magone, 40 F. 573, 1889 U.S. App. LEXIS 2548 (circtsdny 1889).
Opinion
(orally.') Not without some doubt I feel constrained, by the dictionary definitions of the words referred to, to hold that this is “straw,” within the use of the word in the English language as there given, and therefore I shall direct a verdict in favor of the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
40 F. 573, 1889 U.S. App. LEXIS 2548, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blydenburgh-v-magone-circtsdny-1889.