Blydenburch v. Chatterton
This text of 7 Wyo. 160 (Blydenburch v. Chatterton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case in all its facts, and in respect to the -questions reserved, is similar to Rasmussen v. Baker, supra, except that in this case the plaintiff contests the election of the defendant to the office of county and prosecuting attorney, and the number of votes counted and abstracted for plaintiff having been 1,1J7, and for defendant 1,160. The principal question involved is the interpretation of section nine of the sixth article of the constitution. The first and sixth questions reserved for the decision of the Court are the same as the corresponding questions in the other case, and the decision of the court thereon is the same.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 Wyo. 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blydenburch-v-chatterton-wyo-1897.