Bly v. Clerk of Howard County Circuit Court

Fourth Circuit

Bly v. Clerk of Howard County Circuit Court

646 F. App'x 335

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 25, 2016

DocketNo. 15-2545

StatusPublished

This text of 646 F. App'x 335 (Bly v. Clerk of Howard County Circuit Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bly v. Clerk of Howard County Circuit Court, 646 F. App'x 335 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raymond J. Bly appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaint and request for injunctive relief and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Bly v. Clerk of Howard Cty. Cir. Ct., No. 1:15-cv-03273-WMN, 2015 WL 6738742 [336]*336(D.Md. Nov, 2 & Nov. 18, 2015). We deny Ely’s motion for a hearing and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raymond J. Bly appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaint and request for injunctive relief and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Bly v. Clerk of Howard Cty. Cir. Ct., No. 1:15-cv-03273-WMN, 2015 WL 6738742 [336]*336(D.Md. Nov, 2 & Nov. 18, 2015). We deny Ely’s motion for a hearing and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

646 F. App'x 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bly-v-clerk-of-howard-county-circuit-court-ca4-2016.