Bluth v. Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bluth v. Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York

259 A.D.2d 543, 684 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2198

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 8, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D.2d 543 (Bluth v. Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bluth v. Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York, 259 A.D.2d 543, 684 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2198 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York, dated July 16, 1997, which denied the petitioner’s application for reimbursement of funds allegedly misappropriated by an attorney, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), entered February 6, 1998, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York properly exercised its discretion in this proceeding. Santucci, J. P., Joy, Altman and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York, dated July 16, 1997, which denied the petitioner’s application for reimbursement of funds allegedly misappropriated by an attorney, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), entered February 6, 1998, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York properly exercised its discretion in this proceeding. Santucci, J. P., Joy, Altman and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D.2d 543, 684 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bluth-v-lawyers-fund-for-client-protection-of-the-state-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1999.