Blunt v. State

967 So. 2d 1006, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16829, 2007 WL 3118719
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 26, 2007·No. No. 1D07-3006·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(b). The appellant’s motion for an enlargement of time in which to file the initial brief is denied as moot.

ALLEN, VAN NORTWICK, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blunt v. State, 967 So. 2d 1006, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16829, 2007 WL 3118719 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

967 So. 2d 1006 (Blunt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McWane, Inc. v. WATER MANAGEMENT SERVICES
967 So. 2d 1006 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)