Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Blunt v. State

Blunt v. State

820 So. 2d 1032, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9427, 2002 WL 1431902
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 3, 2002
DocketNo. 4D02-2403
StatusPublished

This text of 820 So. 2d 1032 (Blunt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blunt v. State, 820 So. 2d 1032, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9427, 2002 WL 1431902 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

To the extent that petitioner seeks removal of the public defender as his counsel on appeal, his petition is denied because he has failed to allege any cognizable basis for such relief. To the extent that he actually seeks self-representation on appeal, his petition is denied. See Martinez v. Court of Appeal of Cal., Fourth Appellate Dist., 528 U.S. 152, 120 S.Ct. 684, 145 L.Ed.2d 597 (2000); Grant v. State, 780 So.2d 131 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

To the extent that petitioner seeks to disqualify the panel of judges assigned to his appeal on account of bias, we deny his petition. See In re Estate of Carlton, 378 So.2d 1212, 1216-17 (Fla.1979).

FARMER, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District
528 U.S. 152 (Supreme Court, 2000)
Grant v. State
780 So. 2d 131 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
In Re Estate of Carlton
378 So. 2d 1212 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
820 So. 2d 1032, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9427, 2002 WL 1431902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blunt-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.