Blumhoff v. State

1926 OK CR 129, 244 P. 825, 34 Okla. Crim. 6, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 136
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedMarch 27, 1926
DocketNo. A-5418.
StatusPublished

This text of 1926 OK CR 129 (Blumhoff v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blumhoff v. State, 1926 OK CR 129, 244 P. 825, 34 Okla. Crim. 6, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 136 (Okla. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

EDWARDS, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Stephens county on a charge of having possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell, and sentenced to serve a term of 90 days in jail, and to pay a fine of $250.

*7 The evidence discloses that certain officers, with a search warrant, upon premises in the possession of defendant, found 140 bottles of choc beer which they testified was intoxicating. This was hidden in a stack some distance from the house, b!ut at the house other bottles of the same kind were found, and a half dozen bottles of beer in the garage at the house, and three sacks of empty bottles were also found hidden in the stack.

The defendant did not take the stand. The case was tried in August, 1924, and appeal was lodged in this court on the 31st day of February, 1925. No briefs have been filed in behalf of the defendant, and no oral argument made. We find no jurisdictional error, and the evidence reasonably supports the verdict and judgment.

The case is affirmed.

BESSEY, P. J., and DOYLE, J„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1926 OK CR 129, 244 P. 825, 34 Okla. Crim. 6, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blumhoff-v-state-oklacrimapp-1926.