Blumhoff v. Akers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Blumhoff v. Akers

1937 OK 485, 71 P.2d 733, 180 Okla. 589, 1937 Okla. LEXIS 512

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 21, 1937

DocketNo. 28028.

StatusPublished

This text of 1937 OK 485 (Blumhoff v. Akers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blumhoff v. Akers, 1937 OK 485, 71 P.2d 733, 180 Okla. 589, 1937 Okla. LEXIS 512 (Okla. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A motion to dismiss has been filed on the ground that the appeal was-not filed until more than six months after the date of the judgment rendered. On July 31, 1937, this court called for a response by the plaintiff in error. No response has been filed and no excuse is offered for the failure to comply with the order of this court.

Under the rule announced in French v. Bragg, 177 Okla. 43, 55 P. (2d) 953, it is not the duty .of this court to search for some theory upon which to sustain the appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

OSBORN, C. J., and RILEY, PHELPS, HURST, and DAVISON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI