Blumer v. Blumer

Missouri Court of Appeals

Blumer v. Blumer

539 S.W.3d 721

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 26, 2017

DocketNo. ED 104935

StatusPublished

This text of 539 S.W.3d 721 (Blumer v. Blumer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blumer v. Blumer, 539 S.W.3d 721 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Blumer appeals the trial court's judgment related to the execution of a shared real estate ownership agreement, contending that the death of James W. Blumer, a defendant at the trial court, made the judgment a nullity. Finding the trial court properly set aside the judgment as to James W. Blumer and only issued a judgment as to the remaining parties, we affirm the trial court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Blumer appeals the trial court's judgment related to the execution of a shared real estate ownership agreement, contending that the death of James W. Blumer, a defendant at the trial court, made the judgment a nullity. Finding the trial court properly set aside the judgment as to James W. Blumer and only issued a judgment as to the remaining parties, we affirm the trial court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

539 S.W.3d 721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blumer-v-blumer-moctapp-2017.