Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Blumenthal v. Syracuse Savings Bank

Blumenthal v. Syracuse Savings Bank

172 A.D.2d 1073, 571 N.Y.S.2d 395, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6432
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 26, 1991
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 172 A.D.2d 1073 (Blumenthal v. Syracuse Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blumenthal v. Syracuse Savings Bank, 172 A.D.2d 1073, 571 N.Y.S.2d 395, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6432 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

Motion to dismiss cross appeal denied. Memorandum: Defendant has not demonstrated that a notice of entry of the order was served with the order. Absent service of a written notice of entry, the time to take an appeal does not begin to run (Malvin v Schwartz, 65 AD2d 769, affd 48 NY2d 693). Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Boomer and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cruz v. Cruz
2020 NY Slip Op 05004 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 A.D.2d 1073, 571 N.Y.S.2d 395, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blumenthal-v-syracuse-savings-bank-nyappdiv-1991.