Blumenthal v. Syracuse Savings Bank
172 A.D.2d 1073, 571 N.Y.S.2d 395, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6432
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 26, 1991·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Motion to dismiss cross appeal denied. Memorandum: Defendant has not demonstrated that a notice of entry of the order was served with the order. Absent service of a written notice of entry, the time to take an appeal does not begin to run (Malvin v Schwartz, 65 AD2d 769, affd 48 NY2d 693). Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Boomer and Pine, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blumenthal v. Syracuse Savings Bank, 172 A.D.2d 1073, 571 N.Y.S.2d 395, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6432 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).
172 A.D.2d 1073 (Blumenthal v. Syracuse Savings Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cruz v. Cruz
2020 NY Slip Op 05004 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)