Blumenthal v. Exiner
11 Misc. 722, 32 N.Y.S. 1139, 65 N.Y. St. Rep. 870
This text of 11 Misc. 722 (Blumenthal v. Exiner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Blumenthal v. Exiner, 11 Misc. 722, 32 N.Y.S. 1139, 65 N.Y. St. Rep. 870 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).
Opinion
The question involved was whether the defendant made the promissory notes sued, upon; this- was submitted to the jury on- conflicting evidence, and their finding; thereon being Satisfactorily sustained by the proofs, the judgment and order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.
Van Wyck, J., concurs.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
11 Misc. 722, 32 N.Y.S. 1139, 65 N.Y. St. Rep. 870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blumenthal-v-exiner-nynyccityct-1895.