Blumenthal v. Blumenthal
59 A.2d 216, 28 Del. Ch. 448, 1945 Del. LEXIS 24
Opinion
We find no substantial error in the proceedings in this case, and the decree is therefore affirmed. A restatement of the pertinent principles by another and independent opinion would result in no apparent advantage. (See ante p. 1 for opinion below.)
In addition to the authorities cited in the court’s opinion (ante p. 1, 35 A. 2d 831) some additional support may be found in Quarl v. Abbett, 102 Ind. 233, 1 N.E. 476, 52 Am. Rep. 662, and in cases listed in 126 A.L.R. 664, and 145 A.L.R. 1394.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blumenthal v. Blumenthal, 59 A.2d 216, 28 Del. Ch. 448, 1945 Del. LEXIS 24 (Del. 1945).
59 A.2d 216 (Blumenthal v. Blumenthal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
U. S. Industries, Inc., a Corporation, and Diversacon Industries, Inc., a Corporation v. F. Browne Gregg
540 F.2d 142 (Third Circuit, 1976)
U. S. Industries, Inc. v. Gregg
348 F. Supp. 1004 (D. Delaware, 1972)
Cheff v. Athlone Industries, Inc.
233 A.2d 170 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1967)
United States v. van der Horst
270 F. Supp. 365 (D. Delaware, 1967)
E. M. Fleischmann Lumber Corp. v. Resources Corp. International
98 A.2d 506 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1953)
EM Fleischmann Lumber Corp. v. Resources Corp. Int.
98 A.2d 506 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1953)
Greene v. Allen
96 A.2d 349 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1953)
Weinress v. Bland
71 A.2d 59 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1950)
Cooch v. Grier
59 A.2d 282 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1948)