Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Blumenstock v. Weissman

Blumenstock v. Weissman

50 Misc. 2d 119, 269 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1966 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2033
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedMarch 30, 1966
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 50 Misc. 2d 119 (Blumenstock v. Weissman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blumenstock v. Weissman, 50 Misc. 2d 119, 269 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1966 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2033 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In our opinion the holding of the County Court that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the motion to vacate its prior determination would be equally applicable to the Justice’s Court had an application for similar relief been directed to that court in the first instance. (See Duran v. Chelsea Exch. Bank, 123 Misc. 158.)

The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs.

Margett, Brenner and Ollifpe, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aurnou v. Greenspan
182 A.D.2d 523 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Department of Housing Preservation & Development v. Park Properties Development Associates
154 Misc. 2d 315 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1992)
Merrill v. Robinson
106 A.D.2d 818 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 Misc. 2d 119, 269 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1966 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2033, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blumenstock-v-weissman-nyappterm-1966.