Blumen v. Pouker
This text of 234 A.D. 654 (Blumen v. Pouker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs, unless the appellants Hyman Pouker, Belle Pouker and Della P. Felman Corporation forthwith file separate surety bonds to secure payment of the judgment and costs of appeal. Upon compliance with the foregoing condition, said appellants may file notice of appeal nunc pro tunc. Present — Finch, P. J., McAvoy, Martin, O’Malley and Townley, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
234 A.D. 654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blumen-v-pouker-nyappdiv-1931.