Home/Supreme Court/Blumen v. Haff

Blumen v. Haff

296 U.S. 644, 56 S. Ct. 248
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 25, 1935
DocketNo. 526
StatusPublished

This text of 296 U.S. 644 (Blumen v. Haff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blumen v. Haff, 296 U.S. 644, 56 S. Ct. 248 (1935).

Opinion

Petition for writ [645]*645of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Messrs. Roger O’Donnell and Stephen M. White for petitioners. Solicitor General Reed, Assistant Attorney General Keenan, and Messrs. Bart W. Butler and W. Marvin Smith for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
296 U.S. 644, 56 S. Ct. 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blumen-v-haff-scotus-1935.