Blume v. Lowe
998 A.2d 574, 606 Pa. 331, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1507
This text of 998 A.2d 574 (Blume v. Lowe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Blume v. Lowe, 998 A.2d 574, 606 Pa. 331, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1507 (Pa. 2010).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 13th day of July, 2010, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453 (1994) (hybrid representation is improper). The Prothonotary is directed to forward these filing to counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. Reid
642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
998 A.2d 574, 606 Pa. 331, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blume-v-lowe-pa-2010.